CRR-FEP Inner Screen Simulator

Training Set (External Boundary)

Inner Screen (Phantasm Representation)

Control Parameters

Low Ω: Rigid, peaked at high-coherence | High Ω: Liquid, uniform history access
Note: Ω < 0.3 approaches computational instability
C(t) = ∫₀ᵗ L(τ)dτ where L = -F (negative variational free energy)
Effect: Higher coherence = stronger memory amplification via exp(C/Ω)
Accumulated coherence amplifies ALL template accessibility exponentially

Derived FEP Quantities

Markov Blanket Thickness

55.0
AB = κ/Ω + Amin
Thickness inversely proportional to Ω

Precision (π)

1.741
π(Ω) = αΩ
High Ω → Low precision (loose constraints)

Coherence Amplification

148.41
exp(C/Ω)
Memory weighting multiplier from accumulated coherence

Mathematical Framework

Regeneration Operator (Full Implementation)

R[χ](x,t) = ∫₀ᵗ φ(x,τ)·exp(C(τ)/Ω)·Θ(t-τ) dτ
Templates φ weighted by exp(C/Ω) - exponential amplification controlled by Ω
Implementation: weight(shape) = exp(C_global/Ω) × exp(C_shape/Ω)

Memory Weight Function (As Implemented)

w(τ) = exp(C_accumulated/Ω) × exp(C_shape/Ω)
Low Ω: Exponentially peaked at recent high-C | High Ω: Approximately uniform across history
Global coherence C amplifies all template accessibility multiplicatively

Effective Memory Depth

τeff = ∫₀ᵗ exp(C(τ)/Ω) dτ ≈ exp(C/Ω) for constant C
Grows exponentially with accumulated coherence at high Ω
Higher coherence = deeper temporal integration

Coherence Accumulation Dynamics

dC/dt = -F = -(DKL[q(η|μ)||p(η|b)] - log p(b))
Successful prediction (low VFE) increases coherence
Coherence measures cumulative inferential success over system lifetime

Boundary Dissolution Limit

Ω → Ωcrit ⟹ AB → Amin ⟹ |U⟩ ≠ |S⟩|E⟩
At critical Ω, separability breaks down and FEP formalism becomes ill-defined
Safeguard: Ωmin = 0.3 prevents numerical instability

Phenomenological Interpretation